Misinterpretation of GFC audit

first_imgDear Editor,I refer to Anand Goolsarran’s forensic audit of the Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC). It is apparent that the Kaieteur News and David Hinds seem to have corrupt and hidden agendas when it comes to the GFC forensic report as no mention of corruption was made by Mr Anand Goolsarran. But their continued rambling on corruption identified in the GFC’s forensic report is proof that they have hidden agendas. A perusal of Mr Goolsarran’s report shows it has not mentioned any corruption at the GFC, rather he praised the work of the Commission. Please refer to Section 5.2.18 where he stated that he is of the view that the Commission’s interpretation of its mandate is consistent with the Forest Act and that the Commission has been properly organised to discharge its responsibilities.I am quite sure that David Hinds of the Working People’s Alliance (WPA) and Wilburg were aware of the state of affairs of the country prior to 1992, where no national accounts report was tabled in the National Assembly for 10 years. Yes, Hinds and Wilburg should take that and figure out the kind of corruption, rather than trying to twist Mr Goolsarran’s professional report. But these two mocking birds are trying to get the attention of the public.Yours sincerely,Peter Persaudlast_img read more